Fortunately I am better at mastodon server administration than I am at telling what day of the week it is. The infosec.exchange server move is complete.

This post keeps blowing up nearly a year in, wow. Anyway, since I made it I got hired to do email automation for a multi-billion dollar enterprise. No AI!

Microsoft 365 Copilot whatever they’re called today team webcam

Nvidia’s now former CEO also shagged another Nvidia staff member (no, not the prior one or the spy) and they’ve found another two affairs. I think that’s five people now. https://www.reuters.com/technology/former-nvidia-ceo-huang-had-relationship-with-second-employee-sources-say-2026-11-12/

🚨 Many major services appear to be down or experiencing disruptions, with user reports spiking on Downdetector:

• Microsoft Outlook
• Microsoft 365
• Microsoft Store
• Microsoft Copilot
• Microsoft Teams
• Amazon Web Services (AWS)
• Microsoft Azure
• Gmail
• Microsoft OneDrive
• Google
• Microsoft Account
• Cloudflare
• Zoom
• GoDaddy
• Xfinity
• Xbox Network
• Steam
• Amazon
• Calendly
• Salesforce
• Claude AI
• Yahoo Mail
• X (Twitter)
• Facebook
• Archive of Our Own
• Slack
• Microsoft Dynamics
• Microsoft Entra

The scope and cause remain unclear.

💥 Enterprise-level intel, without the enterprise price tag. Plans for everyone. darkwebinformer.com/pricing

Need API access? darkwebinformer.com/api-details

Check out the Telegram channel: t.me/SliceForLifeee

the idea that Jensen Huang is the only person that can run Nvidia, the GOD and SAVIOUR of the most important company in the world etc etc has one small problem:

It's not true.

He's just a guy.

There are many guys.

Stop promoting the idea that One Old Wise Dude runs a company.

help i'm being spear phished

A CEO dipshit named Huang
Caused the market to crash with his wang.
With stock prices tanking,
He should have tried wanking —
It's rather less buck for your bang

One reason AI companies are so eager to report FOSS vulnerabilities is that doing so creates the perception of need. Doesn't matter if they're mostly low-risk or low-priority. Doesn't matter that they were mostly discovered by actual cybersecurity researchers. The perception of need is the point. Volume serves that aim. Dropping 50 reports on a project makes people to think, "Wow, we're cooked without AI." That many reports at once overwhelms the maintainers? Guess they need AI to keep up.

So far in the zed (now gram) codebase I have found three separate theme pickers, two separate markdown parsers and renderers, two separate language server installation implementations, one broken capability/permission system that only applies to one of the language server implementations and a system for loading settings from JSON that leveraged monomorphization bloat (convoluted generic async rust code strikes again) to generate 10 MB of code in the binary... and probably even more nonsense that I'm not remembering now. Trying to fix anything is like pulling at a thread in a ball of yarn but the ball of yarn is the ball from Katamari Damacy and out tumbles three cows, a high rise building and a brass orchestra